-
dbis
-
Publications
-
2009
-
The Relational XQuery Puzzle
Reviews
definitely recommend to accept the paper with a minor revision along the lines mentioned above. p.2, col.1, first par. of Section 2 and footnote 1: The footnote is confusing: First you mention that the work [...] of other approaches in the field. Minor comment: Fig. 2 a) on p.3: the label for node e should be 1.1.1.2 p. 5, section 4, 1st paragraph: “the one we need to support XQuery”: shouldn’t this be “XPath [...] of other approaches in the field. Minor comment: Fig. 2 a) on p.3: the label for node e should be 1.1.1.2 p. 5, section 4, 1st paragraph: “the one we need to support XQuery”: shouldn’t this be “XPath …
